In a shocking action, the US Department of Justice has addressed their stance on internet gambling. The official judgment was issued on Friday before Christmas, however the original decision was made back in September. The judgment came in response to a request by Senators Harry Reid and Jon Kyl for the Department of Justice to clarify its position. Two other states, Illinois and New York, additionally requested clarification with regards to the Wire Act of 1961, one of the main legislation utilized by the Department of Justice in search of internet gambling and casino regulation.
The judgement reverses the Justice Departments preceding stance that all varieties of gambling online are prohibited, yet stops short of stating that the Justice Department looks to establish guidelines for a national internet gambling system. The Department of Justice affirms the new policy “differs from the department’s preceding understanding of the Wire Act, (but) it displays the department’s position in Congressional testimony during the time the Wire Act was initially approved in 1961.” The latest conclusion from the Department of Justice states that the Wire Act only targets sports wagering rather than casino or online casino offerings.
A number of states may take advantage of this decision to introduce new lotto games within their borders. The new perspective does provide the potential of individual states or even a group of states banding together to allow online casinos to make a comeback in the United States.
There is the chance of which a number of states can band together to make a web based casino jackpot providing more desirable. A lot like multi-state lotteries like PowerBall as well as Mega Millions and some interstate horse racing, a multi-state web based zodiac casino jackpots would give the incentive necessary to generate large earnings.
Proponents of legalized online gambling say the business can provide new types of income for states. But others, including large casino interests want a country wide system. They are saying that the free-flowing nature of the Internet is ill-suited for state gambling plans, which would seek to limit online gambling to inside of a given state’s borders.